Bought Coleslaw Dressing

A veto for democracy

Víctor Andrés Ponce

According to Victor Andres Ponce, in this election campaign is very rationally talk about media favoritism toward one candidate or another, this corresponds says, the level of value judgments and make such trials among colleagues is risky for press freedom.

In other words, Mr. Ponce does not like to criticize their colleagues, seem dangerous for the defense of freedom of expression, because a criticism is an affront to the sacred view who share his point of view openly pro-Kuczysnki in the first round and today pro-Fujimori affectionately.

Of course, good Víctor Andrés has nothing to say about arbitrary dismissals of journalists in recent weeks several media in the country, which responded to turns in the editorial to harm the candidacy of Ollanta Humala. Who says you no longer are public executions in this country, has not watched television, read newspapers or listened to radio over the last twelve months.

Mr. Ponce also messes up her hair when tested with facts that the three major media corporations have aligned in favor of Keiko Fujimori and against Ollanta Humala. For which they have arbitrarily dismissed news producers, hired people with the sole purpose of attacking the nationalist candidate (as Jaime Bayly ) coordinated the contents of their respective media to dehumanize the candidate in question (see article Power Magazine 360: Can Trade Ollanta Humala stop? ) and present half truths and lies as refried breaking news as hard evidence or allegations based on transcended.

seems that Victor Andrés Ponce loves the single thought, which is well in line with his friend and employer Fritz Du Bois, editor of Perú21. In this paper does not criticize the neoliberal model, and promotes social conflict, and external vulnerability it creates, not the theft that overlaps. No, this does not criticize anything. Of course, when someone dares to make a challenge at least, little, tiny model, Mr. Ponce and company do take the claws and teeth grinding.

And of course, with a logic of this caliber, all criticism (constructive or otherwise) is considered blasphemous, because it threatens the dogma, in this case the guise of freedom expression. Perhaps because of this, Victor Andrés Ponce gets nervous when I speak of the servility of his colleagues, maybe that explains why you think the questioning attitudes purulent clearly unethical, perhaps afraid of being identified as other colleagues. Who knows ...

One thing is clear, Mr. Victor Andrés Ponce should be launched to Congress, has all the qualities to do so. A speech masking, a dogma of faith, be repelled by those who disagree with him, but mainly has the vocation of Peruvian Congressman otorongo: does not interfere with anyone while nobody mess with him unless put into question its ideological speech.

PS: Not my place to give fashion advice, but I think this guy could sure use an orange tie, I think it would fit.