Saturday, April 30, 2011

Sims 3 Shadow Problem

The old indecency (César Hildebrandt)


The only merit in this life I can grant spotted some successes and many failures, in this thankless career that chose me, in this traditional craft of trying to find the truth that few matter and the lies that are no longer shocked, the only merit I grant you, I say, is not having yielded to the temptation of the medium: resign yourself, so is Peru, tolerates it all, believe the idiots right, who make shady deals and also editorialized in relation to "democratic values" (when the truth is that you lick it and what it means.)

are born in this beautiful country and complicated and the first suggestion that assails you is that of stoicism: be still, quiet brother, so this thing, this does not fix it nor the soy sauce. And you can spend your life making it the blind eye, making the mad and going to face the big stick rocked.
- Nothing you can do, those are the rules, "she whispers Lima toxic air.
- This has not changed no-rivet a shadow, a shadow of what you could be.

I will forgive but I never thought of that. Never did the dead man in the Sargasso Sea of \u200b\u200bwills, broken or corroded. Why? Because I always believed that the country heads down there to look as far as I could. Because ants seeing it makes you want to fly. Because there's beauty in a sagging rebellion and conformity ugliness. Because, after all, being an old believer agnosticism've always thought that Jesus Christ was a rebellious man killed by the ruling order. And without the rebellion of Cáceres our history would have stopped the miserable Iglesias. And without the rebellion of the French De Gaulle would have had to crawl along with Petain, the great right-wing pro-Nazi.

My generation has failed. We have a re-founder of the country and build to Garcia. We have an unhappy set by the crowds, someone who was more driven by love than hate, but we stopped by Robespierre and his native embodiments.

We could have a country and what was a allow mall . Now the ball is on the roof of the young. Depend on them to truly change this country.

as a thousand years ago to live quietly talking, consenting.
speak softly when the Incas were desollarte. And when the English shortest you could chop. And when we were still whispers lip free but subjects of the successive leaders who believed the state was a real estate and a farm for cronies. So we were doing this great Aracataca. Macondo did.

think was and still is-an anomaly. Dissent, a provocation. Rebel, an extension of madness. In a country dominated by injustice you speak of injustice could cost El Fronton. And combat life.

Facing a Tupac Amaru was one hundred Pierola creating their own Caliphate. Because the fear of freedom is not only the title of a book by Fromm. It is the right slogan has been imposed to Peru. His shield is disarmed and its wholesalers genes of their own country.

- All-you say stolen. And that's almost an invitation to steal. Because if everyone steals, no one steals.

- There are no punishments or rewards, all-you forget repeating ground. And that is another incentive to impunity.

The Creole is also the selfish calm thick sauce. The real Peruvian traditions are not those of Ricardo Palma, are to say yes and be in the photo.

Does changes? That's right, say those who cut the ham and the idiots of their services-of Chavez, red, perfectionists, bitter and renegones. In Peru, the anger of the poor masses or fought with bullets and there is a stoic in every future crouching behind the bush days. And when we are sufficiently softened, comes the coup de grace. And when He, the shot, but when I do not think about yourself and dances alone in the tiny tile assigned you, this will be the final day of your workmanship, you'll be one of them. Talk like them, curse like them, will sell like them. And above all, they'll do: deny the other and only recognize among you.

that young people learn the lesson. Nothing will change if we do not kill resignation.

Because democracy is not voting from time to time. Is to exercise freedom at every turn.

Slaves did not love freedom, that's a lie altruistic. Only the free can love freedom and defend it.

Meekness is not maturity but defeat. Stamina is the chronic amnesty. Submissiveness is what was required to blacks Carabalis shipped to force in the port of Macao. Liberty does not kill. Patience is a theological lie which contradicts Christ and that applies to each host Cipriani. Christ was impatient. Life is a blast impatient.

Peruvians were not born a day when God was ill, as I said Vallejo himself. Will be born the day that we know to appreciate the creator of the word vertigo contempt. Contempt is not chaos. Chaos is what will happen when social pressures contained by lead and lies just burst again.

And now would be a great insult, a colossal act of democratic revolt or be fooled by those who want, at the height of indignity, we reward daughter a thief and murderer, thief herself to enjoy the stolen money, under the presidency of the Republic.

shut And all the way to a man who wants to change some things. Only a few things. A man who has moderate experience and has undertaken not to do experiments anachronistic. But I do want the mine to pay what they owe taxes are more direct than the old are less homeless, you have less hunger and rural poverty dims everything that can without disrupting the economy. And it also wants the Peruvian gas supplying first to the Peruvians and the extensive exploration and exploitation of mining and oil interests are reconciled with native and environmental standards are not being met.

The right wants to show us that always wins. Presented four candidates, four variations of the same tune: Castañeda, Toledo, PPK and K. Fujimori, and four lost. He won a gray man who proposed some changes. And worse: he gets the first survey after the first round and the man without too many attributes is winning! And still winning because Lima, this horror, not Peru. Because The government is in crisis Casuarinas. Because the model García, a combination of Caco Friedman, sanguaza drains.

Then, the right proposed settlement, once and forever, this nightmare that stuns the dollar, lower stocks, dripping mascara ago. For that is your television, your radio, your newspaper. And decided on the predictable: the campaign of terror.

terror can only save them. Because they know their candidate's medical records even for 75 unpresentable percent of Peruvians. All that can be, then, is to bombard the reformist uncomfortable with all the B-52 of slander, rumor, dirt, naive idiocy that can spread. The aim is the political murder of the man who proposed some changes. And the dead can not win elections.

talk about foreign interference those who would be annexed to the United States or Chile powerful than they let their grandparents with their cowardice and disunity . Claim that press freedom is threatened to dismiss those journalists who refuse to join the slurry of the campaign against Humala. They warn employment is threatened who have created as many jobs imaginable junk and services operators.

And all this is called "democratic elections." A dirty filth they call "debate." And some banks have no problem with a candidate indecent. They represent the old indecency of parcels, the robbers consolidation laws, the feast of guano. Mrs. K. Fujimori falls off like a glove.

Column published in Hildebrandt to his guns on Friday April 29, 2011. Year 2. N ° 53 *

Home Made Rod Organizer

EMMENTAL TARZAN THE TAKE A PICTURE FRAMED IN THE BALLS TO FIGHT WHILE CROCODILE

addition, it also has a piece of paper between the eggs and see what else. "Tarzan of the Beasts" (1934 Robert F. Hill).

Friday, April 29, 2011

Can People With Autism Drive

TARZAN, BDSM zoophilic

As I'm a little busy with a project ambcioso make me a millionaire, you hang this trocico of "Tarzan of the beasts "(1934 Robert F. Hill). The entire movie is not wasted. Tomorrow another piece.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

What Does The Different Coloured Shag Band Mean?

A CHISTECICO IN CRETINOLANDIA


sometimes hang mine in cretinolandia a joke because of the emergence of a new number and I like. Picad in the picture.

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Campbells Cheese Soup Recipes With Onions

Uhhh. VIOLATED THE PHANTOM. Reincarnation

I just received this nice email, those chain, I think that it suits Dibu. It is happening to me a long story, written by someone 11 years or so, I guess. What cortipego as you received:
Hello, my name is Elsa, died on 04.16.1999 with 11 años ... me asesinaron y ahora mi alma baga en pena. 

La noche del 16 de abril de 1999 me asesinaron... primero me violaron, después me drogaron , mas tarde... me enterraron viva durante 3 horas ... pero eso no fue lo peor... luego me empezaron a triturar viva hasta que al final fallecí ... si no envías esta cadena a 30 contactos o mas apareceré en tu habitación alas 3 de la mañana .... en los pies de tu cama y sufrirás tanto como yo... 

PS: You will not be the 1st person to die by not sending this network ...
many people have not sent, and now ... HERE ARE NO

Monday, April 25, 2011

Restoring Metal Tables



Page 1 of 4. Cats are cool, but I personally prefer alpha reincarnated in a bonobo.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Buy Maine Inspection Sticker

balloon

What Could I Write Inside A Wedding Card

TORTURE OF ELDERLY DUTCH


Everyone knows that the only thing they like physicians is playing paddleball and disappear from your question but 90 percent of people have hidden this truth in the depths of the subconscious because they need to believe that these guys look at you and hawk as they write things on your computer or yawn while listening to your explanations are people who love their profession and empathize with the sufferings of others.
My Marisa was determined to accompany me to my first review of neurology because it says that doctors are more talkative and friendly when dealing with two people instead of one, but she's not over (no, not want to see) that we two together, we look running a nursing home to which we feed porridge in bowls scattered randomly dirty residence in the bathroom, a TV room, under beds, next to the vacinillas, the flat spots and shit, between the toilet and bidet ... Anyway, I am saying that separate is different. I have my purple jogging suit and sporting my silver, my tummy, funny mechoncito covering my bald head, my jersey and my beard atomic ant 6 days. She's living her eyes bulging eyes, his white shirt embroidered with his plaid jacket and his easy laugh dimples. I could be an early retirement due to depression and she owns a craft store. But together we seem only a couple of elderly torturers. I do not know if I understand. I suspect not.
- MARISA, FUCK, JUST LET ME GO, YOU ARE GOING TO THINK THAT WE ARE THE DIRECTORS OF A SENIOR RESIDENCE TERMINAL ILLEGAL!
Marisa refuses to see him, although forced to stand beside me in front of a full-length mirror for 10 or 20 minutes, we get to see as clearly as I do.
- In a madhouse I'll get as you continue with it .- she says. But every time I laugh harder
The doctor seemed to pass anything in the mouth or head because all the sentences left unfinished.
When I talk with doctors, I like to give my questions with an air sotisficada (do you say so, sotisficada?) So they do not think I'm a slob and I have in mind.
- Do you think that the clot is lodged in my brain has been dissolved or perhaps as a raindrop in the vast sea?
- MNOs ... Well ... mmm ... Let me see your teeth.
- Do you think that the clot is lodged in my brain or maybe dissolved like a raindrop in the vast sea? - I repeated the question and looked at my face Marisa with determination. Marisa read a booklet on diverticulitis and probably smiling because he found something funny in the drafting. Always do that: Read the brochures and smiles.
"Show me your teeth, well-(and showed me yours)
- You have not answered my question: Not really, Marisa?
- Oh, you must read this booklet, is hilarious. I have read like a fairy tale.
- shows me his teeth?
I got angry.
"Let Marisa, I'm sick of that everywhere we are taken by owners negligent nursing homes.
Marisa was behind me, laughing. It vovió before leaving the query:
- Do you mind if I take the brochure?
Then, at home, during dinner I asked again ..
- You really can not see, Marisa? When we're together seem a couple dirty and malicious to scam the weak and exploits them.
The idea was lodged in my brain for a few months ago and could not shake my head. Pajolera And I have no idea what was the point at which leaked like a serpent in my mind. But I have reason. It is what we seem.
Marisa not only did not laugh but a few tears in her eyes and trembling lower lip seemed ready to shrink in a pot.
If I knew how ugly it gets when crying did certainly not more.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Edward Syndrome Images

Arar "in the desert?

Arar "in the desert? Three cases in the coastal agriculture in the region and some reflections Lima

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Best Prosumer Camcorder Under 2000

A FRIEND. THE 53


Dutch
Marisa's friend has a couple of times a year and go out there alone to catch up to their ears and act like whores overnight. I must admit that women make me drunk as a motorcycle and know that at about seven o'clock was going to have two home reeking of alcohol would not let me watch TV or read or anything because my blood would cock and was constantly digging under trousers. Not that he expected the Kurds will happen to them entering the room with a Mahou beer and sit on my face, but I say, when I think of drunken women I like to imagine that crap. The Dutch friend is Dutch but Tineo, a town called Mora, and it lives up to name wherever he goes (do not know if my land is called the expression "catch a Morao" I do not know if you know the expression out of my neighborhood because I travel a bit). What happens is that women work in Amsterdam because that's life and although born into a block from a village in Asturias, surrounded by manure, 30 or 40 years may be that you are in Canada or Holland mamporrero teaching in English or may even give you a Galician restaurant chain in Texas or in Moscow and leave you money for the ears. Anyway, I went to bed early and I was half awake all night, with engorged cock and dreaming of drunken violent and uncontrolled, dreaming of my Dutch friend Marisa and her drunken, violent and uncontrolled. Came whispering, the daughters of a bitch. It opened a few beers and started to chat and laugh softly. An hour later, still with laughter emputecidas by alcohol and snuff, and I thought it would be a good idea to crack a straw bed with my good hand. When you're running is a laugh because the hand and leg Plejic shoot out like a spring driven by uncontrollable and makes you a trembling hand as if he had a tambourine. When the same is true also yawn and that made me think for hours on the strange connection there between boredom and orgasm, which broadcast the same order to the impaired limbs. I was let off steam after a while listening in silence, as it seemed that opened more beer and talked about childhood I assumed that this was going to extend to more than 9 in the morning and decided to leave the room naked and pull out the vacuum cleaner because to me on Sunday what I like most is getting up early and suck all the ball home in a tailspin.
What?
course I fucked them party.
In the picture above, a drawing I did today of a hemiplegic in the woods and on the bottom, a two-page abstemious character and asshole.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Portland Lookout Spots

Convicts and not confessed. Media and election results

One week after presidential elections are all about analysis results obtained: the conditions that made it possible for Ollanta Humala and Keiko Fujimori arrived in the second round, imaginary scenarios of what would have been the resignation of one or another Democratic candidate seen, or an "ideal" coalition of a couple of them, given program near their plans of government and politics.

Most analysts have seen a 2x2 explanation, ie, have identified two main stakeholder groups: candidates and voters, and two themes that have marked the field of debate in the campaign: the model and economic democracy.

Trying
summarize the interpretations made so far could say that "most of the electorate has given its vote for two candidates who represent some change in front of their poverty, even though their careers and interests are not necessarily related to democratic values , turning away three candidates offered more moderate alternatives in economic and respect for democratic institutions. " So what explains the orientation of the vote of the people is poverty and the desire for change, while this explains the defeat of the democratic candidates are qualified as the inability to tie his speeches with these requirements and additionally to that, the dispersion of the vote that three nominations were programmatic similarities.

In general, this reading of the election result implied criticisms, some more explicit than others, the management of the current government for social and economic policies. Thus, there was a unanimous consensus on what were the main flaws of the economic model and social policy: the redistribution of wealth reduced product of inefficient social programs. Even one of the candidate most committed to the current model of state management, former President Alejandro Toledo, held a press conference accepting defeat and questioning the country's economic course over the last twenty years.

However the opinions expressed on the need to change the economic model to promote the development of the poorest, most journalists, analysts and politicians (Congress and presidential candidates included) further entrenched defense of Similarly, in a collective amnesia made a record worthy of Guinness or a chapter of Dr. House. In a minute the (auto) were again moderate critics rabid fans of the model and the balance made between 4 pm (ET electoral flash) and 9 pm (time of listing the first report of the ONPE) were pushed into oblivion, lost amid the paranoia of the results.

What happened in those 4 or 5 hours of thoughtful opinions and exchange tacit commitments? How come any time now missed the consensus on the changes required that the next government in economic matters should run?

The answer can be found in the results of surveys and ONPE. At 4 pm we had a scenario in which Ollanta Humala and Keiko Fujimori went to the second round, the first with a difference of reach, the second with a not very comfortable margin against the third party (Pedro Pablo Kuczynski), but with many opportunities to keep the difference. Until then, the fears about a second round candidates "undemocratic" were confirmed, but still hoped a rebound Kuczynski.

explanations to such unwanted scenario did not wait, opting to strengthen the idea of \u200b\u200bvoting for the poor as a vote for radical changes, which had already been put forward during the campaign ever in the shadow of the discourse on growth economic. The nervous search for an answer to explain the virtual triumph of Humala and Fujimori had to do with the confidence shown by many media on the rise of Kuczynski in the polls before the election. In the previous scenario, the defense of the economic model and democratic forms seemed to lose ground to radical alternatives for change. Then, with the exit poll results in hand, puzzled analysts embraced the idea of \u200b\u200bthe veiled criticism to the model and the need for "responsible change", such as those promised by President Garcia in his hours of candidate. Of course, the intentions of change went hand in hand with the desire to see Kuczynski in the second round, perhaps in anticipation of a campaign strategy closer to the demands of the underprivileged.

Over the hours, ads of the polling approach 100% of the results led to the spirits falter and criticism disappeared. For the time of the report ONPE results, consensus on the need for change gave way to consensus on Kuczynski's defeat and the return to the stubborn defense of the model. The passage from one side to another was so pronounced that the announcement declaring Kuczynski ONPE second was not taken seriously by anyone except by enthusiastic supporters gathered in their local candidate's campaign. ONPE The report was based on 18% of the votes counted, most of them from the capital.

Within minutes, nobody spoke of the needs and demands of the poor within hours, along with the results of ONPE announcing the comeback of Fujimori on Kuczynski and its subsequent move to the second round, went back also the discussion on democracy and spent to defend the exclusive discussion of the economic model.

Fallen Kuczynski, the candidate of democracy and economic stability as the media, Keiko Fujimori became the hope of continuity of one of these two values \u200b\u200bthat defends press, in extreme situations like this, as the main objective of the work of the state: growth / stability of the economy.

At this point, it was obvious that the reflection and (auto) review were not sincere. The explanations used to justify an outcome, and to imagine a runoff with a reform candidate who could make timid, while maintaining democratic institutions as additional supply. Defeated candidate media, there was no reason to continue talking about democracy, after all in that regard Humala was considered a coin and a fruit of the authoritarian Fujimori exercised by his father.

On Monday morning most of the media and spoke only of the need to sustain economic growth with dubious democratic alternative, ie, the proposed Keiko Fujimori. In social networks, Facebook and Twitter, view niche dominated by followers of Kuczynski, the image of Keiko began to sweetened with comments that give you the benefit of the doubt regarding his relationship with his father and the corruption of its government, always accompanied by links to media make the same reflective exercise by referring to the mistakes of the Fujimori decade, always minimized compared to the economic achievements of the era. This has been the keynote of the treatment of Fujimori's candidacy in recent days.

Amidst this scenario weird, the question arises: If it is assumed that the problem that caused the electoral scene as undesirable by many is the limited scope of benefits of the economic model, how it is possible that the final reflection of journalists, analysts and the electorate after the first round, is the uncompromising defense of the same model?

Everything seems to point to a vocation disingenuous of the media, which have a kind of traditional conservative trends of migration to occur when unwanted situations like this, trends explain the plausible assumption that they are defending corporate interests related its commercial interests. But like the explanations put forward by the press on the outcome of the election, this statement could be put aside and we could talk about the impartial work of the press if the scenario that is expected to change, ie dealing with the press more impartial news, or at least exert equal criticism of both sides, as any other medium that has begun to make subtle. In both cases, the reasoning is misleading. Returning to the analysis of election results.

We said that the general position of the media on the elections was that this was understood from the perspective of voters and candidates as well as from the themes of democracy and economic model. Thus, a majority of voters in poverty demanded economic change proposals the candidates, without much emphasis on democratic values, and as none of the candidates proposed to continue with the model and emphasize the aspect of strengthening their democratic tied speeches with such majority, the result was his defeat.

The problem with this reasoning has to do with what is meant by poverty and social exclusion, as well as the demands on the role of the state and democracy. Similarly, this argument lacks the inclusion of an additional actor, the press itself. Understanding these aspects of the debate perhaps we can understand the speed of changes in posture, the same positions and alignments of the media in the second round.

According to many analysts and journalists understand poverty from low income, then comes the issue of insecurity and finally serviocios limited access to health and education. Usually in this logic is to nominate the problems in stages, establishing a hierarchy of needs and argument. In other words, analysts define what poverty is low income, so that the discussion should focus on that aspect, if the explanations within the limits of monetary poverty, it is time to discuss safety issues and, finally, the problem of health services and education. Overall, the conceptualization of poverty is limited almost exclusively to the level of income and therefore do not have a vision of the problem.

But the most glaring error in this conceptualization of poverty is not taking into account the social exclusion as a structural element. For many, the exclusion is a feeling, a perception of the population based on their poverty. However, exclusion is a much broader concept, showing not only benefits the poor fail to get the market, but also the degree of integration with the rest of society. And phrasing may sound ethereal, but this has to do with access to quality public services and respect their rights as citizens, without discrimination of any kind.

This absence in the reasoning of analysts and journalists were prevented from observing that this huge part of the population does not want a democratic system that works for some and not others, and does not want an economic model which are the effects but do not feel it. Also how are expected to achieve identification with a form of politics and managing the state that historically has marginalized "kindly" promising development distant someday maybe your grandchildren to see.

From this perspective, the majority vote is partly explained by their poverty, but also and perhaps primarily, by the conviction that the system works for them and does not represent them. The analysts did not see last Sunday was the manifestation of a fragmentation of the country that goes beyond the classic theme of regional identities. The real problem is that over the past 5 years have exacerbated social gaps with the policy of "Perro del Hortelano", in which the main slogan is that the market is the hub of the nation integrator. And, of course, with a significant proportion of the population living near the margin of these benefits, how to wait to feel integrated into a trading nation project in which the exercise of Peruvians is almost equated with the act of shopping in a supermarket or go to a cevichería all times hold your pocket.

Analysts saw this dimension of the problem because they were not prepared to see it. Most of them have been bought and has endorsed the official discourse on economic growth, where rights basic citizens are not written on paper of the Constitution, but in paper money. Therefore, those who have more bills, more rights accrue. But just as outrageous is the use of debate about democracy to disguise or soften the inequities of a system that benefits a minority.

theatrical find in the media statements on the respect for equal rights, freedom, abuse of the state and the need for institutions to maintain the balance of power in the state. The amazing thing about this crusade for democracy is a fallacy on which analysts and journalists themselves fall. In five years of government have become APRA numerous allegations of corruption in all branches of government and influence one another, ie, lacking the independence of each one when the opportunity presented itself. Funny, then, that now defend a weak institutional framework, which directly benefit weaknesses powers that the state press. At this point, namely that such powers ranging from powerful groups (associations and business associations) to medium power groups (some unions or associations of workers).

is clear that the journalists forgot included among the variables in the analysis of results. They forgot that played an important part in information biased information that ended up believing themselves, why they broke the electoral outcome in the face. But, essentially, be fooled into thinking that impartiality was possible from a limited point of view, a common mistake among those who do not realize that the ideology is not a political speech but a way of making sense of actions. Neoliberalism, the politics of money, captured and they have not noticed.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Personalized Licence Plates Availibility Ontario



announced in the previous post a Dangerous Man history and quirky musings that eventually will go to number 3 of the frogs on paper, which is already underway. Here are a couple of jokes about gerontophilia, because I like the word and is a perversion that inspires more pity than hatred. There are also jokes about Chinese and dead dogs. And more.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Can I Purchase A Desert Eagle In Ontario

Let me tell you, VERY SOON IN THE 53

Soon, new in 53 cartoons, with the diseased ramblings the Dangerous Man.